Electrolux EU 0561 C Manual de usuario Pagina 50

  • Descarga
  • Añadir a mis manuales
  • Imprimir
  • Pagina
    / 67
  • Tabla de contenidos
  • MARCADORES
  • Valorado. / 5. Basado en revisión del cliente
Vista de pagina 49
PAGE 50 EC COMPETITION POLICY NEWSLETTER Vol. 1, N° 2, Summer 1994
Summary of most important developments
by Henrik Morch, DG IV-E-1
A. Notion of aid (Article 92,1 EC)
For Article 92(1) to apply the state measure must provide a
firm with an economic
advantage which it would not have
received in the normal course of business. The Commission
considers that this condition is met when a firm receives
financial assistance from the State to cover certain social
costs linked to the retirement of its employees, when the
firm under national law would otherwise have to bear these
costs itself. This is illustrated in the Commission's decision
in May concerning state aid to the French company
"Entreprise minière et chimique"(EMC).
For Article 92(1) to apply the aid measure concerned must
be capable of affecting
trade between Member States. The
Court of Justice has decided that an aid to a company might
distort competition and affect trade between Member States
even if the company receiving the aid exports almost all its
production outside the Community ( cf. judgement of
21.3.1990 ("Tubemeuse"), ECJ 1990 p. 959). In line with
this ruling the Commission decided in June that, in view of
the existence of competing firms and intra-community trade
in the sector concerned, an aid to a tin-mine in Cornwall,
UK, to carry out a restructuring of the mine constituted a
state aid, even though the mine at present exports all of its
production of tin outside the Community.
In determining whether a financial transaction between the
State and a company(ies) involves state aid within the
meaning of Article 92(1) the Commission shall examine the
matter at the time the transaction is carried out or at least
decided in an irreversible way. On the basis of this principle
the Commission decided in July that, given the prosperous
financial situation of the company concerned and the
favourable outlook of the aluminium market in 1990, the
irreversible decision by the Spanish Government in 1990 to
inject 258 million ECU in the "Inespal Group" to enable the
company to take advantage of these favourable market
conditions in 1990-1994 was equivalent to that of a private
market investor operating under normal commercial
conditions. This capital injection therefore did not involve
state aid even though at the time the capital injection was
actually made, in 1992, the market conditions were
considerably less favourable.
B. Possibilities of derogation
Forms
of aid
As a general principle in its state aid policy the Commission
views operating aid and export aid as undesirable and not
eligible for exemption under Article 92 (2) and (3) EC.
However, in certain exceptional cases and under strict
conditions operating aid may be authorized in regions
suffering from serious economic problems and a high
unemployment rate and which are, thus, eligible for regional
aid under Article 92(3)(a) EC. In line with this policy the
Commission decided in June to open the Article 93(2) EC
procedure with regard to a proposed state aid for the
restructuring of the German company AEG Sachsenwerk
GmbH, Regensburg, as this aid measure involves both
operating aid and export aid and as the company is not
located in an Article 92(3)(a) region.
However, the Commission authorized operating aid in the
form of a temporary tax relief scheme for Financial Service
Centers providing capital exclusively for the Eastern
European market in light of the fundamental interest of the
Community to develop a private capital market in Eastern
Europe.
Cumulation
When the Commission examines a state aid for its
compatibility with the common market, it also takes into
consideration the cumulation of this aid with other public
funds, including Community Funds. The resulting aid
intensity must respect the prevailing thresholds for the aid in
question. The Commission therefore decided to open the
Article 93(2) procedure with regard to a German aid for the
construction of a rape seed oil methylester pilot plant
operated by the German company "Raiffeisen
Hauptgenossenschaft Nord AG" whose aid intensity, when
cumulated with aid from Community Funds, reached 67%.
Regional aid
The Commission is committed to allow state aid that help to
reduce disparities between the various regions of the
Community, thereby strengthening its economic and social
cohesion. In line with this policy the Commission in July
decided to authorize a number of important regional aid
schemes for the 5 new German Länder, including the basic
regional aid scheme for these 5 Länder for the period 1994-
1998 (the "Gemeinschaftsaufgabe") with an annual budget of
ECU 7,8 billion.
The Commission seeks to ensure that there is the necessary
coherence between the Community's regional aid policy
under the Community Structural Funds and its regional aid
policy under the state aid rules in Article 92-94. The region
of Hainaut in Belgium was designated in 1993 as an
Objective 1 area by the Council eligible for Community aid
under the Community Structural Funds. The Commission has
now decided to make that region eligible for national
regional aid pursuant to Article 92(3)(c) EC.
In July the Commission, moreover, decided to approve two
investment aid schemes for the region of Hainaut which
offer grants for the setting up of new businesses with an aid
intensity of 25% NGE for big companies and 30% NGE for
Vista de pagina 49
1 2 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 66 67

Comentarios a estos manuales

Sin comentarios